Field comparisonSimulator
Evidence & validation

Compare with the field.

Published inspections, a transparent model, and an honest view of sensor accuracy.

Published reference data
01 / Real underwater inspection

Quepos marina · North breakwater, outside

A marine breakwater, not a bridge. The published April 2016 underwater survey contains grouped thickness measurements, not individual sensor histories.

Steel
ASTM A690
Member
AS-500 sheet pile
Nominal wall
12.7 mm
Cell diameter
18.6 m
Exposure age
7–8 years
Method
Diver-assisted UT
Millan Solorzano (2022), marine sheet-pile monitoringpp. 519–521, 523; Figure 7 (PDF pp. 1–3, 5)
Published underwater readings37

Figure 7 · below-water series

Observed mean bounds11.78–12.28 mm

Derived from bin edges

Loss relative to nominal3.3–7.2 %

Bounds on sample mean loss

Model mean at year 7.512.44 mm

2.1% modeled loss

What the divers measured

Counts within published thickness bins · April 2016

Four readings lie in the 12.5–13.0 mm bin, which crosses the 12.7 mm nominal wall. They are retained; nominal dimensions and inspection measurements need not match exactly.

The source uses 11.0 mm sheet piles in smaller, 12.2 m cells. This comparison uses only the 12.7 mm north-breakwater group.

Run the reference simulation

Published dimensions + adjustable linear loss model

Gray rectangle: grouped-survey mean bounds at age 7–8. Blue dashed line: simulation, not measured history.

Model minus observed mean: 0.154 to 0.654 mm. Positive values mean the model predicts a thicker wall. This is a comparison of aggregate values, not a paired accuracy score.

Different environments explain why a baseline can miss.

The initial 0.035 mm/year setting comes from our temperate immersed-steel baseline. This survey concerns unprotected tropical marine steel. Changing the rate to match the survey is calibration on this dataset, not independent validation. The 7.5-year default is an assumed midpoint, not a known installation date.

Inspect the data and calculation

Mean bounds = Σ(count × lower or upper bin edge) / 37. Loss bounds = 100 × (12.7 − mean bound) / 12.7, reversing the bounds. The interval reflects grouping, not confidence or sensor uncertainty. Nominal wall is the baseline; it was not a measured initial wall for every point.

Thickness interval (mm)Underwater readings
10.5–112
11–11.51
11.5–1212
12–12.518
12.5–134
Download transcribed bins